I hold you to somewhat higher standards...
So, you hold me to higher standards, but don't credit me with enough respect to believe me when I say that I cannot see any better title for my post.
My post has as much to do with Stirling Numbers as a question about regex has to do with the for loop that happens to be a part of the example code.
In other words; the algorithm description could have been for any algorithm that happened to include the 1 element of that description that I was having trouble with, and sought an alternate opinion on.
In reply to Re^2: Bad reasoning?
by BrowserUk
in thread Bad reasoning?
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |