Agree 100%++. I would love to see Mojolicious become the universally and dogmatically recommended Perl web framework. I think it is the best competitor to php that Perl has to offer, much easier to use, learn, start, grow.
I’ve used them all and I am firmly in the Mojolicious camp. Now, I will say, the Catalyst BOOK is one of the best Perl books you can buy. I think it has great software engineering, Test Driven Design principles.
Where is the evidence for claiming that Mojolicious is not stable? Or that it is not appropriate for large projects?
I would start by showing off how immaculately Mojolicious is maintained on github, but that may not be objective enough. So maybe that is the first step, building a set of objective criteria. I am so down to help with this project. SO DOWN.
In reply to Re: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives
by trippledubs
in thread UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives
by iaw4
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |