wasn't trolling at all. on the contrary---I need to figure out what I want to do myself.
yes, you may be quite right that there are too few users of both frameworks to give good comparisons.
basically, you are suggesting that novices flip a coin. it does not seem like a very efficient way to choose between D2 and M, but it is then unavoidable. I am not blaming you (or anyone). on the contrary. (thanks for the advice.) I am just stating what the choice background information is.
PS: in learning one or the other framework, it would be useful to know whether there is a perl6 plan for the long-distant (10-year) future. there is a reason why it is still called perl. a plan here would have been a plus biasing the coin for one or the other framework in my mind. after all, I am starting a new project, so I may as well consider not just stability but future paths, too.
PS Update: http://perl6maven.com/bailador seems to be trying to mimick Dancer.
In reply to Re^4: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives
by iaw4
in thread UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives
by iaw4
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |