Any thoughts on Ruby's new absent operator in its regular expressions (Hacker News thread)? Looks nifty to me and lets one specify more succinctly in some cases, although the things that it do can be done via other means.
In reply to [OT] Thoughts on Ruby's new absent operator? by perlancar
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |