From the linked message, it seems Mr Fredric is most concerned that the test environments are broken. For my modules, that would be Test::More. Following the examples in the documentation, I rely on Test::More to set @INC appropriately. This appears to work, but I should enhance my tests to make sure that the version I expect to be tested is the one being tested.
He also said:
tests exposing runtime bugs are missing.
I assume this comment is targeted to the testing environment. However, I did try Corion's suggested test to see if any are affected by the change to @INC. Otherwise, none of my modules directly rely on @INC to load anything, so I don't know why I would have any tests for that. Configuration files are located by other means and not loaded with do, require nor use.
In reply to Re: #p5p finds your lack of failing tests disturbing
by RonW
in thread #p5p finds your lack of failing tests disturbing
by Corion
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |