My book shows $yday as having a range from 0-365, which gives $yday an effective max of 366. This makes sense; there are 366 days in a leap year, so the range of $yday has to be effectively 366.
I think that the range for $sec is also wrong (0-60 vs 0-59)
Just as we can have leap days, we can have leap seconds- though they generally get less press. ("What? You were born on a leap second? That means you have a birthday, what... every time some standards organization wants you to have one?!"). Or, couched in the slightly less facetious tones of Cookbook: The values for second range from 0-60 to account for leap seconds, you never know when a spare second will leap into existence at the urging of various standards bodies.
In reply to Re: Re: date and time
by belden
in thread date and time
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |