That might be true. Perl6 deliberately borrowed a number of features from Python. But I don't think either Python or Perl6 is "100% class/object based inherently." I mean, they don't force you to put your code in a formal class definition like Java does. You can say that "every object has a class" in those languages, or equivalently "every value has a type," but that's trivially true of any language. Even a monotyped language like Perl1 where every value is a string.
The forced indentation thing is another manifestation of Python's "there's one way to do it" attitude.
In reply to Re^4: [OT] Python vs R
by Anonymous Monk
in thread [OT] Python vs R
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |