In my opinion, the first code example is unnecssarily complicated – notice that it “sent you to Camel book, to no avail.” It all comes down to this, and could have been stated in just this way: %fields = { id => 0, name => 1, age => 2};
It all comes down to, the information the OP already provided?
How can you be confused about what the OP knows when you're actively copy/pasting what he knows?
Calling a hash slice "unnecssarily complicated" is very silly and very telling
because future bug-sleuths will naturally tend to read the human comment and not verify that the code in fact matches it.)
Thats what non-programmers naturally do because they can't read code
Programmers would ignore the comments and read the code
In reply to Re^2: Help me understand this idiomatic hash from array code
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Help me understand this idiomatic hash from array code
by adhrain
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |