Even a negative is a useful answer - it's shows I'm not missing the blindingly obvious. Thank you.
Careful. Even Corion might be missing the "blindigly obvious". Non-existence of something cannot be proved ;-)
Of course this remark is far from being as helpful as I would like it to be. Meh.
In reply to Re^3: Retrieve changes in remote dataset
by shmem
in thread Retrieve changes in remote dataset
by hippo
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |