Thanks for the comments, and I did think about it - but I think I want to keep the "trick question" aspect of the node for now ;-)
Also thank you for your other replies, that's certainly getting pretty tricky with the parsing!
In reply to Re^2: Fun with Prototypes
by haukex
in thread Fun with Prototypes
by haukex
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |