Update: Reran and posted results from matching Perl versions: perl-5.24.2 and cperl-5.24.2c.
Update: Added results from Perl 5.26.0 for comparison.
Hi karlgoethebier,
With little change, the code can run just as fast.
use strict; use warnings; use Data::Dump qw(pp); use feature qw(say); my @points = map { pp($_) } ( [ 0, 0 ], [ -1, -2 ], [ 1, 2 ], [ -1, 2 ], [ 1, -2 ], [ 0, 1 ], [ 1, 0 ], [ -1, 0 ], [ 0, -1 ], [ 2147483647, 2147483647 ], [ 2147483647, -2147483647 ], [ -2147483647, 2147483647 ], [ -2147483647, -2147483647 ], ); kgb_str_look( kgb_str_hash() ); sub kgb_str_hash { my %cells = map { $_ => undef } @points; \%cells; } sub kgb_str_look { my $cells = shift; for (@points) { ( exists $cells->{$_} ) ? say $_ : die; } }
In the spirit of fun, added kgb to the test script. The mat_hash was updated to safeguard from auto-vivification. See this post.
use Data::Dump qw(pp); sub kgb_hash { my %cells = map { pp($_) => undef } @points; \%cells; } { my @points_str; sub kgb_look { my $cells = shift; unless (@points_str) { for my $p (@points) { push @points_str, pp($p); } } for my $p (@points_str) { exists $cells->{$p} or die; } exists $cells->{'notfound'} and die; exists $cells->{'notfound2'} and die; exists $cells->{'notfound3'} and die; } } my $kgb_ref = kgb_hash(); ... timethese 200000, { Big => sub { big_look($big_ref) }, # $cells->{ ($p->[1] << 32) | ($ +p->[0] & 0xFFFFFFFF) } Kgb => sub { kgb_look($kgb_ref) }, # $cells->{ $str } # optimized Lan => sub { lan_look($lan_ref) }, # $cells->{ "@$p" } Mat => sub { mat_look($mat_ref) }, # $cells->{ $_->[0] }{ $_->[1] } Pak => sub { pak_look($pak_ref) }, # $cells->{ pack "ii", $p->[0], +$p->[1] } St2 => sub { st2_look($st2_ref) }, # $cells->{ join(':', @$p) } St3 => sub { st3_look($st3_ref) }, # $cells->{ $str } # optimized Str => sub { str_look($str_ref) }, # $cells->{ $p->[0] .':'. $p->[1 +] } };
Results obtained from a Mac laptop running at 2.6 GHz, comparing perl-5.24.2 against cperl-5.24.2c.
$ /opt/perl-5.24.2/bin/perl test.pl Benchmark: timing 200000 iterations of Big, Kgb, Lan, Mat, Pak, St2, S +t3, Str... Big: 6 wallclock secs ( 5.90 usr + 0.00 sys = 5.90 CPU) @ 33898.31/s +(n=200000) Kgb: 2 wallclock secs ( 2.48 usr + 0.00 sys = 2.48 CPU) @ 80645.16/s +(n=200000) Lan: 5 wallclock secs ( 4.58 usr + 0.00 sys = 4.58 CPU) @ 43668.12/s +(n=200000) Mat: 7 wallclock secs ( 6.80 usr + 0.00 sys = 6.80 CPU) @ 29411.76/s +(n=200000) Pak: 5 wallclock secs ( 5.24 usr + 0.00 sys = 5.24 CPU) @ 38167.94/s +(n=200000) St2: 5 wallclock secs ( 4.54 usr + 0.00 sys = 4.54 CPU) @ 44052.86/s +(n=200000) St3: 2 wallclock secs ( 2.31 usr + 0.00 sys = 2.31 CPU) @ 86580.09/s +(n=200000) Str: 5 wallclock secs ( 4.77 usr + 0.01 sys = 4.78 CPU) @ 41841.00/s +(n=200000) $ /opt/cperl-5.24.2c/bin/cperl test.pl Benchmark: timing 200000 iterations of Big, Kgb, Lan, Mat, Pak, St2, S +t3, Str... Big: 6 wallclock secs ( 5.71 usr + 0.00 sys = 5.71 CPU) @ 35026.27/s +(n=200000) Kgb: 2 wallclock secs ( 2.22 usr + 0.00 sys = 2.22 CPU) @ 90090.09/s +(n=200000) Lan: 5 wallclock secs ( 4.49 usr + 0.00 sys = 4.49 CPU) @ 44543.43/s +(n=200000) Mat: 6 wallclock secs ( 5.88 usr + 0.00 sys = 5.88 CPU) @ 34013.61/s +(n=200000) Pak: 5 wallclock secs ( 5.42 usr + 0.00 sys = 5.42 CPU) @ 36900.37/s +(n=200000) St2: 5 wallclock secs ( 4.44 usr + 0.01 sys = 4.45 CPU) @ 44943.82/s +(n=200000) St3: 2 wallclock secs ( 2.03 usr + 0.00 sys = 2.03 CPU) @ 98522.17/s +(n=200000) Str: 4 wallclock secs ( 4.51 usr + 0.00 sys = 4.51 CPU) @ 44345.90/s +(n=200000)
Results from Perl 5.26.0 for comparison.
Benchmark: timing 200000 iterations of Big, Kgb, Lan, Mat, Pak, St2, S +t3, Str... Big: 6 wallclock secs ( 5.69 usr + 0.00 sys = 5.69 CPU) @ 35149.38/s +(n=200000) Kgb: 2 wallclock secs ( 2.21 usr + 0.00 sys = 2.21 CPU) @ 90497.74/s +(n=200000) Lan: 4 wallclock secs ( 4.33 usr + 0.00 sys = 4.33 CPU) @ 46189.38/s +(n=200000) Mat: 7 wallclock secs ( 6.88 usr + 0.01 sys = 6.89 CPU) @ 29027.58/s +(n=200000) Pak: 5 wallclock secs ( 5.32 usr + 0.00 sys = 5.32 CPU) @ 37593.98/s +(n=200000) St2: 5 wallclock secs ( 4.32 usr + 0.00 sys = 4.32 CPU) @ 46296.30/s +(n=200000) St3: 2 wallclock secs ( 2.13 usr + 0.00 sys = 2.13 CPU) @ 93896.71/s +(n=200000) Str: 5 wallclock secs ( 4.58 usr + 0.00 sys = 4.58 CPU) @ 43668.12/s +(n=200000)
For some reason, the state feature doesn't support initialization in list context.
sub kgb_look { my $cells = shift; state @points_str = map { pp($_) } @points; ... } Initialization of state variables in list context currently forbidden +at test.pl line 341, near "@points;" Execution of test.pl aborted due to compilation errors.
Alrighty, state initialization works fine for an anonymous array.
use feature qw(state); sub kgb_look { my $cells = shift; state $points_str = [ map { pp($_) } @points ]; for my $p (@{ $points_str }) { exists $cells->{$p} or die; } exists $cells->{'notfound'} and die; exists $cells->{'notfound2'} and die; exists $cells->{'notfound3'} and die; }
Regards, Mario
In reply to Re^2: Fastest way to lookup a point in a set
by marioroy
in thread Fastest way to lookup a point in a set
by eyepopslikeamosquito
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |