I'm only looking for unordered tuplesThe mathematical terminology is kind of backwards from the computer science terminology here. You mean that the order of the tuple doesn't matter, and you've put your examples in numerically ascending sequence for neatness. A programmer looks at that and says, "those tuples are ordered."
In reply to Re^3: Faster alternative to Math::Combinatorics
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Faster alternative to Math::Combinatorics
by AppleFritter
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |