Given the amiable, breezy nature of the commentary it might seem odd that it's downvoted, even malicious or personal. It has been said so and I expect will again.
To put that to rest: when this answer is read for comprehension and stripped of everything irrelevant to the original question—all the semantic fugu deflated—it reads–
You never can tell and mistakes happen. I solved this with Perl. Sometimes system tools.
In reply to Re^2: Shouldn't enc2xs always be included as part of Encode?
by Your Mother
in thread Shouldn't enc2xs always be included as part of Encode?
by BeneSphinx
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |