Yeah, after posting this question, I boned up on Moose construction. One important thing I learned is that Moose will just throw out arguments to the object that aren't used; I had always assumed that would throw an error. So what I ended up doing is using a combination of BUILDARGS and BUILD to process the arguments passed to the constructor before setting the attribs attribute and was able to just get rid of the attrIbs attribute. I think it has made my code a little less inscrutable.
That sounds so bizzare when you say it out loud, is Moose really that impenetrable?
In reply to Re^3: Is setting attributes with BUILD in Moose a bad idea?
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Is setting attributes with BUILD in Moose a bad idea?
by nysus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |