I would really not recommend that (even less than AUTOLOAD), but it is certainly possible to obtain what you're looking for by tampering with the symbol table.
Update: Tampering with the symbol tables is what Anonymous Monk suggested earlier, I had not seen this post when I wrote mine.
In reply to Re: Technique for building arguments from function name?
by Laurent_R
in thread Technique for building arguments from function name?
by nysus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |