G'day Dallaylaen,
These are just my thoughts and personal preferences on the subject. I don't even present these as recommended guidelines. It's entirely your choice whether you wish to implement any of these ideas.
I do like to see function names in the index because it aids page navigation. I only want to see the function name appearing once in the index; not multiple entries with every variation of the argument list.
I prefer to add function names alphabetically; again, for ease of navigation. I would normally add a function name at the =head2 level. With a large number of functions which, perhaps, fall into some natural grouping, I might use =head2 for group names and =head3 for the function names. Whether or not I decide groupings are needed, I'll generally aim for all functions to be at the same =headN level.
Here's how I might present a function with a variable argument list:
=head2 function C<function> can take various arguments as follows. $retval = function(); $retval = function($arg); $retval = function($arg, \%arg_map); $retval = function($arg, \%arg_map, \@arg_list); The arguments are: =over 4 =item C<$arg> A string denoting ... The default is ... =item C<%arg_map> This is a hash of ... ... =back Missing arguments use the defaults shown. The return value (C<$retval>) is always ...
Obviously, that's just a very sketchy outline. Meaningful names for variables, even in documentation, greatly aid comprehension. And, of course, when I come back to this in six months, there should be sufficient information for me to use function(...) without having to search through the source code: if it doesn't do that for me, it won't do it for others, and I've just wasted my time bothering to pretend to provide documentation.
— Ken
In reply to Re: Guidelines for listing functions/methods in POD?
by kcott
in thread Guidelines for listing functions/methods in POD?
by Dallaylaen
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |