Hi Karl, the standard practice I believe is to use a Role for something a thing *does*, not what it *is*, which is why Roles don't have constructors normally. FWIW (approx $0.02).
In reply to Re: What About Providing Constructors in Roles?
by 1nickt
in thread What About Providing Constructors in Roles?
by karlgoethebier
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |