It will be some factor slower (say, 5-10x) because of disk writes. There is a maximum file size, so depending on your data, you may need multiple subhashes each mapped to its own file.
But if your problem is easily solved another way, staying in memory, you'll probably be happier.
-QM
--
Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of
In reply to Re: Memory utilization and hashes
by QM
in thread Memory utilization and hashes
by bfdi533
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |