Yeah, but effectively that's what Your Mother was asking for, a counterexample for the thesis that multidimensional hashes are safe.
Hence a "proof" according to you. ;)
to elaborate more: every example proofs something, but not every proof needs an example.
Or in formal notation:
Example => Proof
So of course YM's "aka" is not correct in mathematics.
But in IT it's important to see how likely a problem is, because nothing is without risk.
For instance the same problem might be easily solved with multidimensional keys, where hashes of hashes have a higher risk to run out of space or to be vulnerable of bugs because of higher algorithmic complexity.
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
In reply to Re^6: Hash key composition with a comma? (updated)
by LanX
in thread Hash key composition with a comma?
by mpersico
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |