The controls and options are deeper and it is much more robust. Starman starts dropping requests and such under load. I suspect my problems were largely an edge case caused by legacy code and EOL'd Linux but I had nothing but straight up segfaults and mysterious socket failures pointing to ancient unconfirmed tickets trying to get Starman working at work. Here is one of many benchmarks out there. I really wanted to like Starman better. I'm gung-ho for Perl even when it's not the best option but in this case, for me at least, there was nothing at all to recommend the Perl side.
In reply to Re^3: UTF-8 and PSGI/Starman vs. CGI
by Your Mother
in thread UTF-8 and PSGI/Starman vs. CGI
by dsheroh
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |