$a = 1e-3; $b = 0.001; if ( $a eq $b ) { ...

Note that this doesn't really have anything to do with eq or ==, but with how Perl handles numeric literals in its source code - they are converted to Perl's internal representation first.

# force numbers to strings before printing:
$ perl -wMstrict -le 'print "".1e-3; print "".0.001;
    print "".0.0_0_1; print "".0x1.0624dd2f1a9fcp-10'
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
# edited for brevity:
$ perl -wMstrict -MDevel::Peek -le 'Dump( 1e-3 )'
  NV = 0.001
$ perl -wMstrict -MDevel::Peek -le 'Dump( 0.001 )'
  NV = 0.001
$ perl -wMstrict -MDevel::Peek -le 'Dump( 0.0_0_1 )'
  NV = 0.001
$ perl -wMstrict -MDevel::Peek -le 'Dump( 0x1.0624dd2f1a9fcp-10 )'
  NV = 0.001

[download]
would two numbers always numerically oompared by "eq"

If I take the question to mean "does eq do numeric comparisons automatically when presented with numbers", the answer is no, it always converts its operands to strings first (I'm ignoring overloading here).

can I rely on this in general

But my question would be: Why would you want to rely on this? If you want to do a numeric comparison, you should use the numeric == (always keeping in mind the limitations of floating-point numbers!*), and if you want to know if two values converted to strings are equal, use eq - and looking at the above, eq's behavior makes sense here.

At the moment, I can't think of a case where one would want to do such an "automatic numeric comparison". Could this be an XY problem - are you perhaps trying to do something with user input? (Update: If you want a number to retain its formatting, you need to store it as a string instead of a number.)

* Update: And if you want to know whether two numbers are approximately equal:

$ perl -wMstrict -le '
    if ( sprintf("%.3f",0.001) eq sprintf("%.3f",0.001001) )
      { print "yes" } else { print "no" }'
yes

[download]

In reply to Re: Why does this string comparison compares "numerically" and can I rely on this in general? by haukex
in thread Why does this string comparison compares "numerically" and can I rely on this in general? by Bloehdian

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.