So I'd say that x() is primarily in lvalue context here.
That implies it has a secondary context. It doesn't. When an lvalue sub is called, it always does the same thing. Returns an lvalue to the calling context.
And what's being assigned to @x is not the return value of x(), but the return value of the assignment operation, which is an lvalue itself.
What is assigned to @x, is the result of the rvalue expression. And that, is the result of the assignment to lvalue returned by the subroutine.
In reply to Re^3: can sub check context for lvalue vs rvalue context?
by BrowserUk
in thread can sub check context for lvalue vs rvalue context?
by perl-diddler
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |