Whether or not rename(2) will be atomic depends very much on the operating and file systems. Unfortunately File::Copy's move adds another layer of uncertainty, since it doesn't guarantee to use rename under the hood. But then again, when the rename operation is atomic, it's a great way for updating a file with one writer and many readers (multiple writers still need to coordinate). You might be interested in my module File::Replace.
In reply to Re: Safely read/write a file simultaneously
by haukex
in thread Safely read/write a file simultaneously
by golux
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |