Every time you cite your Cabal of Seven Disgnomons—while pretending you're helping by aping things already said but without the veracity or diligence or humility that a couple dozen monks here put in every week—I'm going to remind everyone who reads your posts that there is no monk more widely downvoted, no monk who has pwned the entire Worst Nodes page where the price of entry is 20+ downvotes, and that the number of historical downvoters is well in excess of 7² because you shitpost 99 out of 100 times and are immune to feedback, constructive or otherwise.
Interesting sidebar: I upvoted you twice this week and twice the week or two before but three were old nodes and the newish one actually had effort and no errors which is a minor miracle for you.
You assert people want a second opinion when they ask questions here. If you would just extract your cranium and get some air, you might realize that when someone asks a question here they aren't looking for your résumé or decrepit technical tap-outs but an answer. Plenty of us give non-Perl answers semi-regularly. Answers.
In reply to Re^3: XML access a solution, an actual solution
by Your Mother
in thread XML access the REPEATING NODE VALUES
by Magnolia25
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |