If you're going to use a formula like that, I would lobby for clamping to negative: $NORM<20 ? -20 + $NORM : -1;. Otherwise, if our $NORM quality spikes suddenly to 25*, some poor schmuck who "only" got +4 for a mostly-unnoticed post for some "Re^9" gets his reply hidden.
*: okay, probably not likely with modern Best Nodes scores... but the idea is that I believe positive-voted nodes shouldn't be evaluated as "very bad", and so protection should be built in against that admittedly-unlikely event.
In reply to Re^3: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors
by pryrt
in thread RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors
by jdporter
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |