But I think it should be consistent to avoid confusion.
AMs can still read "bad" posts by navigating the thread or via newest node° and some will start to complain why RAT is "broken".
A solution could be to flag those posts visibly, maybe with a red link explaining what is happening.
Like including something like
DISPUTED!
in the posts head or title. (It's a self explanatory link)
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice
°) or googling ...
In reply to Re: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors ( DISPUTED )
by LanX
in thread RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors
by jdporter
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |