Obviously, which is a bug arguably. But then, indented sub declarations are (within my coding standards) closures and such. I will use
qr{^\s*inline\s+sub\s+(\w+)\s*(?:;|\{)}ms
if I can be convinced that this is a sensible default for inlineable subs.
In reply to Re^2: RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword?
by shmem
in thread RFC: Inline::Blocks or inline as a keyword?
by shmem
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |