Thanks for the clarification, it was pretty unwise of me to say so much without checking my facts more. So while Go can't have the full power of autovivification on undeclared structures, it would be conceivable when declared as nested data but undefined. It's just not the case. Not sure I'm going to put that knowledge to good use any time soon, but at least I relearned not to assume what a language dis or is like :-)
In reply to Re^3: Does Go steal from Perl? :-)
by Eily
in thread Does Go steal from Perl? :-)
by reisinge
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |