Interesting. I guess this explains the limitation with Lexical::Types where it allows you to define, say, my Str $x to do something else other than check $x is a blessed Str object (and I've started to explore that possibility using Lexical::TypeTiny), but still requires there to be a Str package defined. I guess Perl needs that package to exist so that it can look for %FIELDS.
In reply to Re^5: Recap: The Future of Perl 5
by tobyink
in thread Recap: The Future of Perl 5
by Ovid
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |