Right, BerkeleyDB and friends. Thank you for reminding me.
I could provide excuses like "but that one only stores strings" or "but I don't want to pull outside dependencies" or "but it's only a dozen lines or so"... there are many solutions like it, but this one is mine. Don't worry, I'm not a professional programmer.
In reply to Re^2: A hash that stores itself between runs
by Anonymous Monk
in thread A hash that stores itself between runs
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |