underscore _convention() ?
> That alone should warrant making anything you truly need to be private into a coderef.
But coderefs can't be used for protected routines.
Anyway, I have no issues with documenting private routines, as long as it's clear they are not part of the compatibility "contract".
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice
In reply to Re^4: (How) Do you document/test your private subroutines?
by LanX
in thread (How) Do you document/test your private subroutines?
by stevieb
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |