for completeness, we might not get a "Subroutine _frobnicate redefined at" warning but it is possible to dynamically inspect a parent class with ->can from UNIVERSAL
So it's not that the "sub-class"-developer is completely in the dark.
It should even be possible to check this automatically.
(which is the saner approach since people don't tend to read the docs after a parent class got extended)
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice
In reply to Re^6: (How) Do you document/test your private subroutines? (->can)
by LanX
in thread (How) Do you document/test your private subroutines?
by stevieb
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |