"would give" the same number if Xref was ever fixed.
To be clear: line numbers in Perl will never be 100% exact, because statements can span several lines, and because sometimes multiple statements are optimized into a single one.
But there is no reason (AFAIK) why a variable should be skipped from a report or the declaration being reported after the first use, like Xref is doing now.
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice
In reply to Re^12: B::Xref buggy?
by LanX
in thread B::Xref buggy?
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |