that was exactly one the "more perlish ways" I was referencing. I would have done it that way for myself, but I thought the explicit swap was more concrete for the OP to understand what was going on.
In reply to Re^5: Repeat question (redo)
by pryrt
in thread Repeat question
by hchana
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |