Looks fat to me ( just kidding :)

Is this any faster? Or does the compiler optimize away the differences? 

int l[] = {
  0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
  0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
  0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
  0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
  0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
  0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
  0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 };

int
c_luhn2( char *s ) {
    return ((
        l[ (int)s[ 0] ]
      +    s[ 1]
      + l[ (int)s[ 2] ]
      +    s[ 3]
      + l[ (int)s[ 4] ]
      +    s[ 5]
      + l[ (int)s[ 6] ]
      +    s[ 7]
      + l[ (int)s[ 8] ]
      +    s[ 9]
      + l[ (int)s[10] ]
      +    s[11]
      + l[ (int)s[12] ]
      +    s[13]
      + l[ (int)s[14] ] - 7 * '0' ) * 9) % 10;
}

[download]

In reply to Re^7: Faster Luhn Check Digit Calculation? by tybalt89
in thread Faster Luhn Check Digit Calculation? by kschwab

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.