"Otherwise I don't understand the point of the whole thread and am quizte happy I didn't try to waste time on coding an even faster solution."
That seems a bit harsh. Everything here is still usable from Inline::C when pure speed is wanted. Since I made a "clone" of an existing module, it seems having it work like that one, but still quite a bit faster, is worthwhile. Apparently, it's not just Standard & Poor's using letters and values > 10 for this kind of stuff. Looks like OpenMRI and The Regenstrief Institute do as well.
I can either make another module that's purely about speed, or see if your suggestion above pans out for this module.
In reply to Re^13: Faster Luhn Check Digit Calculation?
by kschwab
in thread Faster Luhn Check Digit Calculation?
by kschwab
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |