So do you agree with hippo here that the new inode numbers for alpha/foo* in the linked doc are in error?
Was it the original behaviour of perl in the past, when the author wrote it? The author did a good job explaining it so it's hard to believe it's a mistake.
Oh, I almost forget it. Thank you ikegami for your answers.
In reply to Re^4: How does rename() work on read-only files?
by j41r
in thread How does rename() work on read-only files?
by j41r
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |