From perlop
Unary "+" has no effect whatsoever, even on strings. It is use +ful syntactically for separating a function name from a parenthesiz +ed expression that would otherwise be interpreted as the complete +list of function arguments. (See examples above under "Terms and List Operators (Leftward)".)
In reply to Re: u+ fails to force scalar context to empty list assignment: +( () = ... )
by tybalt89
in thread u+ fails to force scalar context to empty list assignment: +( () = ... )
by rsFalse
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |