My point was that if you want to convince someone of your argument, you need to spell out exactly what the argument is. The statement that many other languages use dots does not present a valid reason why the use of dots should prevail. In my opinion, Perl got it right, and it is the other languages that should be looking to Perl's example. Now, since the current syntax is on my side, if you don't agree that Perl got it right, then elucidate your argument as to why not. And if you make a good argument, I'll listen. If not, then you're just towing the line.
Also, speaking of hypotheticals and "would-be Perl users somewhere down the line" is meaningless, as I tried to point out somewhere in this jumble of a thread. I can just as easily talk about the theoretical end of OO and death of dot syntax in that case. Consequently, I would rather hear concrete reasons for or against, which one can normally only derive from personal experience.
matt
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.