But your proposed fix only handles 95% of the problem. Why didn't I try fixing things that way? (ie What does your fix miss?)
BTW so far this code example is not making the case for Perl being maintainable look very good... :-(
UPDATE
Your update is half-right. The half that is wrong is the most common misunderstanding I have encountered about how split behaves...
UPDATE 2
Eventually seems to have come. Modulo difficult questions about how the definition of a word ain't what you would expect. Consider a kudo delivered. :-)
In reply to Re(tilly) 4: Efficiency in maintenance coding...
by tilly
in thread Efficiency in maintenance coding...
by eduardo
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |