I think that in this particular instance, .*? ought to be fine, as embedded font tags are not legal (whereas in Ovid's example, embedded "s are fine).

In this case we're looking for stuff between <font ...> and </font> so .*? works a charm, although, if you had code that had:

<font ..> text <font ..> more text </font> and some </font>
you'd get
text <font ..> more text
out. This would be awkward, but a negated character class won't save us. If it is possible that you're getting insane html, then you have to expect bugginess on any regexp we come up with.

In reply to Re: Re: html tag matching confusion by jarich
in thread html tag matching confusion by moonlord

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.