Personally, I find the first to be more expressive. It tells me, the reader, that you're talking about a directory structure because that's how I'm used to seeing it.# Having defined $HOME, $first, $second up above somewhere... # Using interpolation my $dir = "$HOME/$first/$second"; # vs. Using join my $dir = join '/', ($HOME, $first, $second);
join, to me, talks about creating generic strings, usually for some cryptic file using comma-delimitation or as a way of printing out an array in a readable form.
Now, this is all personal style. I guess I'm just used to seeing it that way.
As for speed ... I haven't done the Benchmarking, but I think that interpolation might actually even be faster.
As for usability, I will agree that it's easier to manipulate a list vs. manipulating a string, but that usually doesn't really matter. Most of the time, you're manipulating said string in a recursive fashion. So, you're just adding vs. adding & subtracting (which you'd have to do if you converted the recursion to a loop).
------
We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.
Don't go borrowing trouble. For programmers, this means Worry only about what you need to implement.
In reply to Re: Re: {3} Using Variables in Path Names
by dragonchild
in thread Using Variables in Path Names
by lfindle
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |