Once, doing maintenance, I had to find and fix a bug in some code. I spent ages sifting through a printout of the source trying to figure out how it worked and what was going wrong. It was only when I loaded the source into a syntax hilighting editor that I realised that a big chunk of the code I was trying to decipher had actually been commented out.

Production code should not have any commented out sections. Production code should *always* go through some sort of version control system while it is being developed. This means that all changes made during development are recorded, but the poor maintainer does not have to see them unless he needs to.

In reply to Re: Commented out production code? by perlmoth
in thread Commented out production code? by t'mo

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.