That's kind of an interesting way of doing it. I wonder how CGI.pm's method of doing things compares to using autoloader? Typically, whenever I create a module, I prefer to just use h2xs -X modulename to set up my Makefile.pl and stub module. That stub module is already set up to use Autoloader. Would I be better off speed wise if I tried to implement my modules the same way that CGI.pm does?
In my particular case, most of my work is done with mod_perl, so I'm guessing that using Autoloader is probably better from a memory efficency perspective. Then again, I suppose CGI.pm is typically used in mod_perl as well. Can anybody shed some light on this subject?
In reply to Re: Re: Require Load Times
by ehdonhon
in thread Require Load Times
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |