Patterns are collections of objects, so to understand patterns, you need to understand Object-Oriented Programming (OOP).
That's odd, my copy of A Pattern Language by Christopher Alexander and Sara Ishikawa and Murray Silverstein. New York, NY., Oxford University Press, 1977., doesn't say anything about Object-Oriented Programming! You might want to either show us the missing portion of your work or qualify such statements, since they don't stand too well on their own.
–hsm
"Never try to teach a pig to sing…it wastes your time and it annoys the pig."In reply to Re: RFC - OOP and Turing machines
by hsmyers
in thread RFC - OOP and Turing machines
by mstone
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |