I have to agree with wog and jptxs. I'm speculating that whoever did this was not aware of any but the most obvious implications. That's hair-raisingly false laziness. Conventions form over time for good reason. Challenging them may lead to better solutions, but one shouldn't do so mindlessly. I often find myself enlightened and sticking to a convention after questioning it even if I thought it really stupid before.
Finally, I think the fact that everyone here disagrees with that code and even you yourself have doubts is a pretty clear indication of its worth.
Makeshifts last the longest.
In reply to Re: Hiding the Module 'Path'
by Aristotle
in thread Hiding the Module 'Path'
by dvergin
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |