Mason doesn't actually require mod_perl. It can run as CGI (however it will be very slow).Does this mean, mod_perl only provides Mason the persistent CGI process capability? Or, are any other capabilities of mod_perl taken advantage of by Mason?
Put in another way, if the persistence of CGI processes is provided by in a non-mod_perl way (example, FastCGI or SpeedyCGI), does Mason work as effectively as in a mod_perl environment?
Thanks,
/prakash
In reply to Re: Re: How common is mod_perl?
by PrakashK
in thread How common is mod_perl?
by jerrygarciuh
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |