Monks,

Is there a way of avoiding the use of no strict 'refs' in the following code fragment. I know symbolic references are ugly, but the alternatives are probably worse. Is this one of those cases where no strict 'refs' is best?

sub AUTOLOAD { use vars qw($AUTOLOAD); my ($pkg,$method) = ($AUTOLOAD =~ /(.*)::(\w+)$/); my ($self,@args) = @_; my $pkgTmplt; my $pkgv = $pkg.'::_template'; { no strict 'refs'; $pkgTmplt = $$pkgv{$method}; } if ($pkgTmplt) { my $acc = $self->accessor($method,$pkgTmplt); my $chunk = <<END package $pkg; sub $method { $acc } END ; eval $chunk; die "Error making accessor: $@\nCode follows:\n$chunk" if $@; wantarray ? ($self->$method(@args)) : $self->$method(@args); } else { croak "Unknown sub $method in $pkg "; } }

In reply to strict refs and package namespaces by rinceWind

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.