By using indirect notation, you're removing the capability for the interpreter to spellcheck you if you have defined a new function in the current package.

I find this less than compelling, perhaps because I always use parenthesis on method or function calls.   my $bar = new FOO(); isn't going to be tripped up by having written a new routine in the current package. Consider 

package FOO;

sub new {
    print "right!\n";
}

package BAR;

sub new {
    print "wrong!\n";
}

my $f = new FOO();   # prints "right!"

[download]
Update: hold on, my $f = new FOO;    # also prints "right!" Where's the problem?

In reply to Re: Here's a quick example why not to use Indirect notation by dws
in thread Perl High School by hsweet

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.