Hrmmm, geek and style, is that a contradiction of terms in itself?
I like to think so ;)
* The ++ denotation within the whitespace around operators seems without merit
I knew I had to document it better (will do). It's just the difference between $foo++ and $foo ++ - choose any direction ;)
# The == denotation within the whitespace around operators is duplicated by the gt denotation because in fact, after all, == is just another equality test.
I separated them because I have seen someone consequently use "$foo > $bar" and "$foo==$bar"
* For example, Vp(s0h0a0) should be able to be reduced to Vp0.
Perhaps, but that would make the rules very complex, and I think that if someone's going to parse, a simple regex will have to be able to do the job ;)
U28geW91IGNhbiBhbGwgcm90MTMgY
W5kIHBhY2soKS4gQnV0IGRvIHlvdS
ByZWNvZ25pc2UgQmFzZTY0IHdoZW4
geW91IHNlZSBpdD8gIC0tIEp1ZXJk
In reply to Re: Re: Style geekcode
by Juerd
in thread Style geekcode
by Juerd
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |